SBIR Scrutiny Is Rising—Here’s What Contractors Need to Know About Foreign Influence Risk
The SBIR/STTR programs have long been a lifeline for tech-focused small businesses looking to fund innovation and bring new products to market. But in 2025, these “America’s Seed Fund” programs are under intense scrutiny—not for how much they fund, but who they fund. If you’re a small business eyeing these grants, or already holding one, foreign affiliations are now a make-or-break factor. And agencies aren’t treating these risks equally.
A new Senate-led report, backed by years of audit data, has exposed serious holes in how federal agencies screen for foreign influence. Contractors are getting caught in the crossfire—or slipping through the cracks. Either way, this could reshape how you prepare proposals and structure your government contracting business.
Let’s break down what’s happening, what’s changing, and what you need to do to stay in the game.
What’s Going On With SBIR/STTR Oversight?
A 2025 Senate Small Business Committee investigation found that out of 835 SBIR/STTR applications flagged for potential foreign influence, only 36% were denied. That means most questionable applications still received taxpayer dollars.
Why? Because vetting varies wildly by agency:
NIH flagged and denied every high-risk applicant.
NASA flagged 125 but denied only one.
DoD, the largest SBIR player, showed mixed results—flagging 522 and denying 152, while still awarding nearly $180M to six firms with ties to China.
Some agencies (like DOE and DHS) barely reported at all. And others still award grants to so-called “SBIR mills”—firms that rake in funding without delivering commercialized results. Some of these mills have clear links to foreign adversaries.
The bottom line? The lack of consistent oversight means some small businesses could face intense scrutiny, while others skate by depending on the agency. But new legislation could soon change that.
Why This Matters for Contractors
Here’s the hard truth: if your company has any ties—direct or indirect—to China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea, your SBIR/STTR eligibility is now on thin ice.
Under the 2022 SBIR/STTR Extension Act, agencies are required to implement due diligence programs. But the newly proposed INNOVATE Act of 2025 takes things further:
Defines “foreign risk” explicitly
Grants agencies clawback powers if tech is later linked to adversaries
Caps total SBIR/STTR funding per company (to prevent “mills”)
Simplifies Phase I submissions but raises commercialization accountability
So if you’re applying, or planning to, your entire ownership structure, investor pool, partnerships, and even unpaid advisors must be squeaky clean. A forgotten JV with a foreign research institute? That could kill your proposal—and cost you future government contracting opportunities.
How to Stay Eligible: Five Actionable Tips
Here’s how small businesses can stay in the running—and out of trouble:
Do a Full Foreign Ties Audit
Scrutinize all investors, owners, subcontractors, and staff for connections to “countries of concern.”
Disclose everything, even minor affiliations, in the foreign disclosure form. Omission is a fast track to disqualification.
Clean House If Needed
Divest from foreign-owned subsidiaries or exit questionable partnerships now.
Restructure licensing or JVs that could appear problematic.
Document Commercialization Progress
Don't just win Phase I after Phase I. Show that you're building real products, capturing customers, or securing private funding.
Track and Report Changes
Get in the habit of updating your contracting officer about ownership changes, new hires, or foreign partnerships—even post-award.
Harden Your Cyber and IP Protections
Agencies are informally weighing cybersecurity posture. Clean networks, IP logs, and documented controls can give you a compliance edge.
This Isn’t Just About Security—It’s About Survival
For contractors—especially those pursuing federal contracting certifications or engaged in the government contracting certification process—this isn’t just red tape. An undisclosed foreign tie can block future awards or, worse, lead to funds being clawed back.
If you're a women owned small business certification holder or seeking disabled veteran small business certification, this new landscape underscores the importance of compliance across all fronts—not just in identity or eligibility, but in ownership structure, international affiliations, and commercialization readiness.
The silver lining? The coming reforms might make the process more consistent and predictable. If the INNOVATE Act passes, expect clearer definitions, more uniform vetting, and fewer surprises. First-time applicants could benefit from simplified proposals, while repeat winners will need to show impact—not just funding history.
Until then, the smartest move is to act like every agency is NIH: full disclosure, full compliance, and no gray areas.
If you’re navigating these changes and need help preparing airtight proposals, our team specializes in SBIR Grant Assistance, Government Contract Proposal Writing, and guiding firms through the government contracting certification maze. Whether you're looking for 8a certification assistance, getting started with sba 8a certification services, or refining your proposal strategy, we can help you position your business for success.
👉 Want more insights on how to stand out in competitive SBIR/STTR solicitations? Read our post on how “Step-by-Step Guide to Federal Government Contracting for Small Businesses in 2025”
If you aren't a Squared Compass partner, what are you waiting for? From getting your business set up with specific government set aside programs at both the State and Federal level, to being empowered by a Fractional Capture team to win government contracts, to receiving tailored government contract opportunities Squared Compass delivers immense value which helps propel our partners to success. Schedule a chat with our team today.
