When the Grocery Money Stops: What a One Month Halt to SNAP and WIC Means
By any measure, it’s a lousy time to be a cashier, a grocer, or a hungry kid, waiting on Washington.
The setup. With the federal shutdown still unresolved, USDA has told states it cannot fund November SNAP benefits without new appropriations; several states echoed the directive publicly. WIC has also been flagged as at risk, with states scrambling to patch funds. Households may spend down any October benefits that were already loaded, but new November issuances are suspended until Congress acts.
The national math, by the numbers
How big is SNAP in a typical month? In May 2025, states issued $7.865 billion in SNAP benefits, our cleanest pre-shutdown baseline. The monthly national participation hovered around 42 million people, with an average benefit ≈ $189–$191 per person in FY2025.
How big is WIC? WIC served ~6.7 million people on average in FY2024, with federal program costs of $7.2 billion for the year (food plus admin). Monthly food-benefit dollars vary by state and month, but this frames the order of magnitude at stake.
Macro impact: USDA’s economic model estimates that each $1 billion in SNAP spending supports $1.54 billion of GDP and about 13,560 jobs when the economy softens. Scale that to a one-month halt and you’re looking at roughly $12 billion of GDP and ~106,000 jobs not supported this month.
Where the hit lands first: States and cities
Top issuing states (May 2025) by benefit dollars: California ($1.05B), New York ($647M), Texas ($614M), Florida ($536M), Pennsylvania ($356M), Illinois ($368M), Ohio ($270M), Michigan ($259M), Georgia ($252M), North Carolina ($241M). These ten alone account for well over half of national monthly SNAP dollars.
Cities (what we can say with official numbers): New York City publishes actual SNAP expenditures: $417.3 million in May 2025, and that is just NYC proper. Other large metro counties (Los Angeles, Cook/Chicago, Harris/Houston, Maricopa/Phoenix, Miami-Dade, Philadelphia, Dallas, Bexar/San Antonio, San Diego) carry similarly outsized caseloads in their state dashboards; most can be translated to dollars using the USDA monthly average benefit.
“Lost sales tax”? Not really.
SNAP-eligible groceries do not incur state or local sales tax when purchased with SNAP. Retailers may not charge it on the SNAP-paid portion, full stop. So the primary public-finance effect of a one-month halt is lost private consumption and its multipliers, not foregone sales-tax receipts.
Who in the checkout aisle feels it most?
Grocery chains with the largest local market shares in high-SNAP metros will see the most abrupt gap in tender:
- Houston: H-E-B leads with ~25.2% share (2024).
- San Antonio: H-E-B holds >50% of the market.
- San Diego: Albertsons/Vons/Pavilions around 21% by sales.
- Philadelphia metro: Walmart (~16.6%) edges Acme (~15.7%).
WIC: the quieter, costlier fallout
WIC isn’t an entitlement; funding lapses hit fast. Industry groups and press reports warned that, absent backfill, programs could run short within weeks, though several states have pledged to keep WIC flowing in November using state or carryover funds. Even short gaps matter: WIC participation is linked to better birth outcomes and lower near-term Medicaid costs, benefits you can’t “make up” after the fact.
What a shutdown month looks like on Main Street
For households: Less to spend on groceries now, not in December. SNAP is designed to be monthly and smooth; interruptions force immediate substitution (pantries, credit, skipping meals). Average monthly benefits near $190 per person aren’t easily replaced for a family of four.
For grocers and distributors: EBT redemptions drop nearly one-for-one with the missed issuance, especially in neighborhoods with high participation. NYC alone would have been roughly $400M+ lighter in SNAP tender on a monthly baseline. The upstream effects (trucking, warehousing, private-label suppliers) follow.
For macro watchers: Apply USDA’s multipliers to the $7.9–8.0B month. That’s roughly $12B in GDP activity and ~106k jobs that would have been supported, deferred or lost depending on how long the lapse lasts and whether spending rebounds later.
The fine print (and why it matters)
This is not hypothetical language from advocates; it’s in writing. USDA’s October guidance to states warned of insufficient funds for full November SNAP benefits if the shutdown persisted, and states (e.g., Georgia) publicly cited the USDA authority for a suspension effective Nov. 1.
Data caveat: USDA labels monthly program tables “preliminary and subject to revision.” That does not change the order of magnitude, or the fact that SNAP is a monthly cash-like flow into grocery tills.
What to watch next
1) How long the lapse lasts. A few days is painful; a full month distorts stocking, hours, and neighborhood store finances.
2) State stopgaps for WIC. A growing list of states says WIC will continue in November using state or residual funds; that reduces, but doesn’t erase, risk to maternal/child health outcomes.
3) Household scarring. Evidence from prior lapses and benefit cliffs: some families don’t return promptly after disruptions, magnifying long-run costs.
The bottom line
For a program that quietly moves $8 billion a month through grocery lanes, turning off SNAP (and wobbling WIC) is not a rounding error, it’s a shock you can plot on a GDP chart and feel in a checkout line. The economics are straight from USDA’s own models; the human stakes are in the carts.
Want to learn more?
Check out our related Youtube Video: Government Shutdown 2025: Head Start Closures & WIC Food Aid Crisis
If you aren't a Squared Compass partner, what are you waiting for? From getting your business set up with specific government set-aside programs at both the State and Federal level, to being empowered by a Fractional Capture team to win government contracts, to receiving tailored government contract opportunities Squared Compass delivers immense value which helps propel our partners to success. Schedule a chat with our team today.
